Why This Matters
Hemocompatibility is a system decision
Heparin or non-heparin. Short-dwell or implantable. Animal-derived or synthetic. Each path carries its own clinical, regulatory, and manufacturing implications. The companies that get hemocompatibility right are the ones who treat the coating choice as a strategic decision that ties to the device's clinical profile and its regulatory pathway, not as a finishing-step specification.
This is why Surmodics engages at the feasibility stage. Decisions made early in development shape what is possible in validation, what is defensible in regulatory submission, and what is durable in long-term use. The coating system that fits the device is rarely the one that came up first in the conversation. It is the one that emerged from a structured evaluation of clinical use, dwell time, substrate, and regulatory pathway.